When 3D printing, the slicer is a fundamental component of the process because it highly impacts print results. Machine improvement has gone hand-in-hand with software development, allowing us to achieve greater and greater results. So, let’s take a look at two of the most appreciated slicers in the 3D printing community: UltiMaker Cura and Orca Slicer. They’re both free but are also pretty different, so you might be wondering which will suit your workflow best.
One of the most popular slicers in the 3D printing world is without a doubt UltiMaker Cura. Released in 2014, this software has 10 years of development on its back. For this reason, Cura is one of the most suggested slicers for beginners: it’s a stable program that’s continuously improved by the company behind it, UltiMaker.
On the other hand of the spectrum, there’s Orca Slicer. Developed by the community, it isn’t even two years old, yet its popularity and use have skyrocketed over a short period of time, and for good reason. In fact, Orca Slicer is one of the most advanced slicers that you can use, with a long list of unique features.
Although Orca Slicer is a fork of Bambu Studio, which happens to be a fork of PrusaSlicer, this software has set itself apart from them and implemented some tools that makers love. This slicer is definitely worth a try, especially for advanced users.
Now, let’s dive deeper into the topic!
No matter which slicer you go for, it’s important to ensure that your computer meets the minimum system requirements so the program can work properly.
For Cura, you’ll need at least 550 MB of available hard disk space and an Intel Core 2 or AMD Athlon 64 with at least 4 GB of RAM, as well as support for OpenGL 4.1. Although Cura will work with these specs, UltiMaker recommends 600 MB available hard disk space and Intel Core i3 or AMD Athlon 64 with 8 GB of RAM.
On the other hand, the exact technical requirements for Orca Slicer aren’t specified, but the software is available for the most popular operating systems, including Windows, MacOS, and Linux. You can check detailed installation instructions for this slicer on GitHub. The process is as simple as finding the right folder for your device and following SoftFever’s guide.
Cura’s and Orca Slicer’s interfaces have common traits and differences. Cura was designed to offer a clean interface where beginners can easily get their bearings, while Orca Slicer was meant to offer the most tools possible. Let’s dive deeper into it.
Cura offers an intuitive environment to ease the process for newcomers. It’s easy to learn thanks to key components of its organization:
Although Orca Slicer also offers a clean layout, the interface is more complex than Cura’s and is meant to give you all the most advanced instruments that you may need. For this reason, the most evident characteristics of this slicer are:
While in general they might appear to be pretty similar, Cura and Orca Slicer are different, and each offers distinctive tools that make them stand apart from the other. Next, we’ll compare the standout features in the latest stable releases of the software (Cura 5.7.1 and Orca Slicer 2.0.0). Let’s see what they offer!
Both slicers are loaded with interesting and useful features, and while they’re still well-organized, Cura maintains a cleaner interface that can help new users. Because of three premade settings filtering options – Basic, Advanced, and Expert – makers can have a simpler or more detailed list of settings, while Orca Slicer offers only two options (enabling and disabling the “Advanced” setting), which might just make Cura friendlier for beginners.
Furthermore, as noted by a Reddit user, one of Cura’s highlights is the premade printer profiles. The long list and the high quality of the profiles can be really helpful when getting the hang of a new machine. That’s not to say that Orca Slicer doesn’t have printer presets – there’s just more variety in Cura (over 440 vs. around 135).
On the other hand, it’s worth noting that, being a fork of Bambu Studio, Orca Slicer is better suited for Bambu Lab printer owners (at time of writing, there are no Bambu Lab presets in Cura). For the same reason, Orca Slicer is also a breeze when working with multicolor prints, so if you own an IDEX machine or use a multicolor unit, Cura might not be the right choice.
In any case, Orca Slicer can be used later to take the quality to the next level, thanks to the calibration tools that it offers.
Both slicers are open source, but since their origins are so different, their supports are different.
Cura is much older than Orca Slicer, and it’s developed by a company rather than a small community. For this reason, you can find official resources for Cura both on UltiMaker’s YouTube channel and on the UltiMaker forum. You can access UltiMaker support directly from the software by clicking on the square icon at the top right of the UI and selecting “UltiMaker support”.
Furthermore, since Cura has been widely used for premade profiles from 3rd party machine manufacturers, you can also find brief guides of the software on different printer companies’ websites.
That’s not to say that you’re on your own if you’re working with Orca Slicer. You can find support from the community on the dedicated Discord group, on the GitHub page in the “Discussions” section, or, if you’re more familiar with Reddit, you can check out the Orca Slicer subreddit.
So which is better for you? The answer is, “it depends”.
As we have seen in this comparison, both slicers are valid options and have their pros and cons. Although they are both a good choice for beginners and advanced users, Cura might be more appropriate for those who are newer to the 3D printing world thanks to its intuitive interface.
On the other hand, Orca Slicer is meant for more expert users who can greatly benefit from the wide list of settings and tools that this slicer offers, and who are willing to spend some time tweaking the profiles to get the best print quality possible. For a big project that involves printing various parts or having a clear workflow that includes using multiple build plates, Orca Slicer would be the better choice.
The major advantage of Cura is its longer presence in the 3D printing landscape. There are lots of guides and community members that can help you. Orca Slicer is relatively new but the team behind it has proven to be determined to implement more and more features that will change the 3D printing game from the software side.
License: The text of "Orca Slicer vs Cura: The Differences" by All3DP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.